Nonce Bitcoin Mining Company Data & Analytics
Nonce Bitcoin mining data hub: track 17 publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies. Compare BTC production, treasury, hashrate, power capacity, fleet efficiency and unit costs from SEC filings and company disclosures.
Industry snapshot · as of 2026Q2
All companies →Company Rankings · 2026Q2
| # | Company | Source | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bitdeer Technologies(BTDR) | 2,694 | +32.4% | +376.8% | 150 | 80.9 EH/s | $0.044 | $40K | $36K | 1,795 MW | 15.8 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 2 | Marathon Digital Holdings(MARA) | 2,422 | +7.8% | +2.7% | 35,577 | 57.4 EH/s | $0.040 | $61K | $39K | 1,900 MW | 17.3 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 3 | CleanSpark(CLSK) | 1,925 | +7.0% | -4.3% | 13,924 | 45 EH/s | — | — | — | 808 MW | 16.07 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 4 | Riot Platforms(RIOT) | 1,587 | +7.7% | +11.3% | 11,380 | 37.2 EH/s | $0.036 | $50K | $40K | 1,292 MW | — | 2026Q22 |
| 5 | HIVE Digital Technologies(HIVE) | 1,004 | +14.6% | +147.3% | 190 | 24 EH/s | $0.054 | $51K | $46K | 440 MW | 16.1 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 6 | American Bitcoin(ABTC) | 935 | +14.4% | — | 17,316 | 28.1 EH/s | — | — | — | 710 MW | 16 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 7 | Cango Inc.(CANG) | 656 | — | -53.3% | 1,056 | 27.58 EH/s | — | $73K | — | 50 MW | — | 2026Q22 |
| 8 | Keel Infrastructure(KEEL) | 354 | -8.8% | — | 2,261 | 8.6 EH/s | $0.054 | $93K | $54K | 341 MW | 19 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 9 | Cipher Mining(CIFR) | 346 | -23.3% | -32.0% | 646 | 11.6 EH/s | $0.028 | $43K | $37K | 207 MW | 17.2 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 10 | Core Scientific(CORZ) | 300 | -24.1% | -52.7% | 848 | — | — | $79K | $60K | 300 MW | — | 2026Q23 |
| 11 | Canaan(CAN) | 244 | -5.4% | -14.1% | 1,915 | 5.57 EH/s | $0.043 | — | — | 246.2 MW | 23.7 J/TH | 2026Q22 |
| 12 | BitFuFu(FUFU) | 192 | +52.4% | +34.3% | 1,671 | 15.3 EH/s | — | $59K | — | 273 MW | 17.9 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
| 13 | TeraWulf(WULF) | 179 | +6.5% | -63.1% | 2 | 5.6 EH/s | $0.049 | $45K | $44K | 145 MW | 16.4 J/TH | 2026Q2 ↗ |
| 14 | Soluna Holdings(SLNH) | 23.5 | -17.3% | -17.8% | 0 | 0.598 EH/s | — | $41K | — | 192 MW | 23 J/TH | 2026Q23 |
Visual comparison · 2026Q2
BTC Production · 2026Q2
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| BTDR | 2,694 |
| MARA | 2,422 |
| CLSK | 1,925 |
| RIOT | 1,587 |
| HIVE | 1,004 |
| ABTC | 935 |
| CANG | 656 |
| KEEL | 354 |
Hashrate (EH/s) · 2026Q2
| Label | Value (EH/s) |
|---|---|
| BTDR | 80.9 EH/s |
| MARA | 57.4 EH/s |
| CLSK | 45 EH/s |
| RIOT | 37.2 EH/s |
| ABTC | 28.1 EH/s |
| CANG | 27.58 EH/s |
| HIVE | 24 EH/s |
| FUFU | 15.3 EH/s |
Treasury · 2026Q2
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| MARA | 35,577 |
| ABTC | 17,316 |
| CLSK | 13,924 |
| RIOT | 11,380 |
| KEEL | 2,261 |
| CAN | 1,915 |
| FUFU | 1,671 |
| CANG | 1,056 |
Cash Cost / BTC · 2026Q2
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| BTDR | $39,866 |
| SLNH | $40,766 |
| CIFR | $43,486 |
| WULF | $44,547 |
| RIOT | $49,912 |
| HIVE | $50,797 |
| FUFU | $59,000 |
| MARA | $60,743 |
Frequently Asked Questions
View all →Why can cost per bitcoin and electricity price be negative?
A negative value does not mean mining is free — it means the company reports on a net basis: subsidies, demand response revenue, curtailment compensation, or power resale revenue can exceed actual electricity cost in a period, making the net electricity price or energy cost per bitcoin go below zero.
What is the difference between energy cost per bitcoin and cash cost per bitcoin?
Energy cost per bitcoin covers electricity / energy only. Cash cost per bitcoin is broader: site operations, hosting fees, maintenance, mining pool fees, on-site labor, insurance, and other direct cash outflows. Cash cost is typically higher.
What does average operating hashrate mean? Why is it preferred for comparison?
Average operating hashrate is the hashrate that actually runs and produces BTC over a period. It differs from deployed / installed hashrate — those do not guarantee full-quarter uptime. Since BTC production and electricity consumption come from actual operations, average operating hashrate aligns best for cross-company comparison.
Why may the same metric differ across data websites?
Disclosure has multiple methodologies; common differences:
- Quarter basis: calendar vs fiscal
- Hashrate methodology: average operating vs period-end vs deployed
- Cost methodology: electricity-only vs electricity + hosting vs disclosed "average mining cost"
- Power credits: subsidies / curtailment / resale revenue may or may not be deducted
- Non-cash items: depreciation / impairment / SBC / BTC fair value changes
- Source priority: filings vs monthly production updates vs investor decks
Different numbers usually mean different methodology, not an error.
Why can methodology differ across years for the same company / metric?
Business structure and disclosure practices evolve:
- Business model: hosted ↔ self-mining / cloud / data center
- Mining assets: M&A, JVs, relocations, expansions, shutdowns
- Disclosure habits: one year average operating hashrate, another deployed only
- Cost classification: electricity / hosting / maintenance / depreciation presentation
- Industry environment: halvings, power restrictions, accounting standards
- Restatements: annual reports or later quarters revising earlier metrics
We track both the number and its source / methodology.
Data snapshot built 2026-10-23